Mangilal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur disposed of a second bail application by rejecting the plea, considering the gravity of the offences and without adjudicating on the merits of the case.
What did the court decide?
Second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is rejected.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. II Bail No. 6302 / 2017
Mangilal S/o Shri Hurji, B/c meena, Age 22 years, R/o Maanpura Khalsa, Thana Dholapani, Tehsil Chhoti Sadri, District Pratapgarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.L. Bishnoi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Awasthi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Judgment / Order
04/08/2017
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether second bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the nature of accusation.
Whether the petitioner qualifies for anticipatory or regular bail in proceedings for Sections 307/149 IPC and Arms Act offences.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mangilal S/o Shri Hurji
- respondent
The State of Rajasthan
Coram
Vijay Bishnoi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/6302/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court