This order concerns a petitioner alleged to be involved in robbery, assault for wrongful restraint, and other offences investigated under CrPC S. 173. The court notes the petitioner is currently confined in prison.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
र�जस � �न�उच � �न � ���ल��ज�प�र�प�ठ�ज�प�र
आद�श
एकलप�ठ�द�ण� � क�व�व�ध�जम�नत�प��!न��पत��स$ख � �- 13635/2016
Anil Kumar Son of Shri Hari Ram By Caste Jat Dheenwal Resident of Raju Ki Dhani Police Station Taranagar District Churu (Raj.)
( At Present petitioner is confined in in Central Jail, Ajmer)
---Accused/Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan through P.P.
--Non-Petitioner
आद�श ददन��क 06 जनवर�, 2017
म�नन�य न य�य�ध�पत� श� बनव�र� ल�ल शम��
श��क��क��भ(����अधध�क�-अभ(��क-प��,�क-�ओर�स
श��आर�एस�र�घ�- व�द�न1�ल2क�अभ(�2जक���सत � र�ज�
अभ(��क-प��,�न � अपन��जम�नत�ह�त � �ह�जम�नत�प��!न��पत�द�� पक6���स$हहत��क-�ध�र��439 क��अध�न�प�भलस���न� - म��गललय�व�स जजल� अजम�र म8�प$ज�बद�क-�ग���प�म�स<�न��स$ख��- **178/2016** अपर�ध�अनतग!त ध�र�-395,323,341 (�रत���द���स$हहत��क��समबनध�म8�पसत�त�कक���ह>।
इस�पर�अधध�क��अभ(��क-प��,���व�द�न1�ल2क�अभ(�2जक�क2�स�न� ग���त���पत��लA�पर�उपलबध�कर����ग���स�मग��क��ध��नप<�!क
-2-
अ�ल2कन�कक���ग��।�
व�द�न1�अधध�क��प��,-अभ(��क�श��क��क��भ(����न � नन��दन�कक���ह> कक�इस�म�मल � म8�सह-अभ(��क�स�र�श�उर! �न�ल<�क��जम�नत�आ��दन�प<�!�म8 इस�न����ल��क-�सहप�ठ�द�र��आद�श�हदन�$क� 28.11.2016 स **�** स��क�र कक���ज����क��ह>, णजसस � अभ(��क-प��,�क��क�स�ककस��पक�र�(��भ(नन नहA$�ह>, अत: अभ(��क-प��,�क2�(��जम�नत�क-�स�व�ध��दA�ज���।
व�द�न1�ल2क�अभ(�2जक�न � प��!न��पत�क��व�र2ध�कक��।
उ(��पक�क��तकH�पर�व���र�कक���ग��।
पकरण�क��समसत�तथ�K�ए�$�पररणस�नत�K�त���पत��लA�पर�उपलबध कर����ग���स�मग��त���व�श�ष�रप�स � इस�तथ��क2�दवPगत�रखत � ह�ए�कक प<�!�म8�सह-अभ(��क�स�र�श�उर! �लAल<�क��जम�नत�आ��दन�सहप�ठ�द�र� स��क�र�कक���ज����क��ह>, णजसस � अभ(��क-प��,�क��म�मल��भ(नन�पत�त नहA$�ह2त��ह>, मR�पकरण�क��इस�प6म�पर�ग�ण��ग�ण�पर�क2ई�अणनतम�र�� व�क�कक� बबन��अभ(��क-प��,�क2�ध�र�-439 द���पक6���स$हहत��क� प��ध�नK�क��तहत�जम�नत�क-�स�व�ध��हद���ज�न��न���2ध�त�प�त��ह<$।
अत: अभ(��क-प��,�द�र��पस�त�त��ह�जम�नत�क��प��!न��पत�स � �क�र कक���ज�कर�आद�श�हद���ज�त��ह>�कक��हद�अभ(��क-प��,��अननल�क�म�र प�त�हररर�म�नन��स�- र�ज<�क-�ढ�ण����न�-त�र�नगर�णजल����र�द�र��रप�� 1,00,000/- (एक ल�ख रपय� म�त ) क��स � �$�क���ब$ध�पत����रप�� 50,000/- -50,000/- (पच�स-पच�स हज�र रपय� म�त ) क-�द2�पनत(<नत व���रण�न � ���ल��क-�सन�त�णW�X�क-�प�श�क-�ज���, त2�उस � प�म�स<�न� ररप2X!�स$ख � �- 178/2016 प�भलस���न�- म��गललय�व�स जजल� अजम�र स� सम�बणन�धत�पकरण�म8�इस�शत!�क��स���जम�नत�पर�ररह��कर�हद���ज��� कक��ह�पकरण�क-�स�न��ई�क��दYर�न�न � ���ल��द�र��ब�ल�� ज�न � पर उपणस � त�ह2त��रह�ग�।
अननलशम�/M-4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the charges of robbery (S. 395 IPC) and assault for wrongful restraint (S. 341 IPC).
Whether the petitioner has suffered sufficient prejudice due to police inaction to warrant bail.
5 provisions across 2 enactments
Anil Kumar
The State of Rajasthan
Anil Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
