The High Court dismissed the criminal misc. application as it had become infructuous based on counsel's unopposed statement at Bar.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B.Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 141 / 2014
In
S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No. 422/2012
Nagesh Sapaliya Urf S K Nagesh
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Purushottam Sharma.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Shekhawat, P.P. for State.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Judgment
05/01/2017
Learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at Bar that the instant criminal Misc. Application has become infructuous which is not opposed by the Public Prosecutor.
The instant criminal Misc. application is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.
Manisha/-2
Nagesh Sapaliya Urf S K Nagesh
State Of Rajasthan Through PP
Mahesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
