The High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking quashing of an FIR as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to raise arguments at the trial stage.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise arguments before the trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
O R D E R
S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.256/2016
AKSHAYA KUMAR JAGDHARI & ANR. Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
DATE:05.08.2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Mr. Chhatrasal Singh Tanwar on behalf of Mr. Ajay Gupta, for the petitioners. Mr. Jitendra Shrimali, Public Prosecutor for the State. *****
Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that present petition was filed to seek quashing of the FIR. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that since during pendency of the present petition chargesheet has been filed, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to the petitioners to raise all arguments before the trial Court at appropriate stage.
As prayed, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J. /KKC/
Akshaya Kumar Jagdhari & Anr.
State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
