Allowed

Ramveer and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC21 Sept 2016CRLMB/12015/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to two accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The High Court, without deciding the merits of the underlying charges, deemed it just and proper to release them pending trial on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each.

Ramveer and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶2

O R D E R

¶3

S.B.CR. MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 12015/2016

¶4

Ramveer son of Shri Bhagwan Singh.

¶5

Ramu son of Shri Amiri Singh.

¶6

Both by caste Thakur, resident of village Ramgadha bidar, P.S. Rajakhera, Distt. Dholpur (Raj.).

¶7

(At present in Distt. Jail, Dholpur).

¶8

...Accused-Petitioner.

¶9

Versus

¶10

State of Rajasthan through P.P.

...Respondent.

DATE OF ORDER :::::

21/09/2016

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶15

Mr. Anil Jain, for the petitioner/s.

¶16

Mr. Rishi Raj Singh, Public Prosecutor for State.

¶17

This bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶18

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No. 130/2016 was registered at P.S. Rajakhera, Distt. Dholpur for the offences mentioned therein against the accused petitioner. During the course of investigation, the accused petitioner(s) was/were arrested. Thereafter he/she/they moved the bail application before the trial court, who vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence this bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner(s).

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has contended that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case, they have nothing to do with the alleged crime, there is no case made out against the petitioner(s). It has also been contended that the accused petitioner(s) is/are in judicial lockup since long and the conclusion of trial of the case is likely to take time,hence the accused petitioner(s) should be released on bail.

¶20

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed

¶21

the bail application.

¶22

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to release the petitioner(s) on bail.

¶23

Therefore, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner(s) (1) Ramveer S/o Shri Bhagwan Singh and (2) Ramu S/o Shri Amiri Singh be released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with afore-mentioned FIR provided he/she/they furnish(es) a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees two lac) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lac) each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he/she/they shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶24

(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

¶25

Om/-

Ramveer and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramveer and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laakhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Vishnu Dutt Goyal and Anr. Vs Smt Kalpna Gupta @ Mamta

Om Prakash Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Vikas Sharma Vs Murti Shri Kishori Mohanji Maharaj and Anr.

Gilettee India Ltd. Vs Assistant Commi of Income Tax Anr.

Ramesh Chand Vs Tanelal Saini LRSandORS