Allowed

Radhey Shyam Teli v. R S R T C and Anr.

Rajasthan HC28 Sept 2015CW/297/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This batch judgment deals with writ petitions by retired employees of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation seeking unpaid retirement benefits. Due to financial constraints, the Corporation could not make immediate payments. The Court directed the Corporation to pay the dues within six months with interest.

What did the court decide?

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation is directed to pay the due amount of pension, gratuity, and other benefits to the petitioners within six months from today along with interest at the rat

Radhey Shyam Teli Vs R S R T C and Anr. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR

¶3

(1) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14748/2014

¶4

Prahlad Singh

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

¶7

(2) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5182/2014

¶8

Ramji Lal Sharma

¶9

Versus

¶10

Managing Director-cum-Chairman & Ors.

¶11

(3) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13995/2014

¶12

Dinu Kha

¶13

Versus

¶14

The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

¶15

Babu Lal Gaur

¶16

Versus

¶17

The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

¶18

(5) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2140/2015

¶19

Ramratan Sharma

¶20

Versus

¶21

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶22

(6) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2626/2015

¶23

Arjun Dutt Sharma

¶24

Versus

¶25

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶26

(7) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2627/2015

¶27

Om Prakash Gupta

¶28

Versus

¶29

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶30

(8) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2842/2015

¶31

Mahesh Chand Goyal

¶32

Versus

¶33

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶34

(9) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6364/2015

¶35

Rajendra Singh Parihar

¶36

Versus

¶37

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

¶38

¶39

(10) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6982/2015

¶40

Trilok Krishna Mishra

¶41

Versus

¶42

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

¶43

(11) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6983/2015

¶44

Karam Veer Singh

¶45

Versus

¶46

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. (12) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7167/2015 Ramesh Chand Gangawat

¶47

Versus

¶48

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶49

(13) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7951/2015

¶50

Roojwelt Rakesh Hijkal

¶51

Versus

¶52

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶53

(14) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7952/2015

¶54

Sohan Singh

¶55

Versus

¶56

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶57

(15) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7953/2015

¶58

Satpal Singh

¶59

Versus

¶60

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. (16) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7954/2015

¶61

Mahendra Kumar Devmurari

¶62

Versus

¶63

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶64

(17) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7955/2015

¶65

Umesh Kumar Sharma

¶66

Versus

¶67

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶68

(18) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7956/2015

¶69

Sh. Kailash Chand

¶70

Versus

¶71

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶72

¶73

(19) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7957/2015

¶74

Veerendra Singh

¶75

Versus

¶76

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. (20) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7958/2015

¶77

Roop Chand Sharma

¶78

Versus

¶79

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. (21) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7959/2015 Kamal Kant Mishra

¶80

Versus

¶81

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. (22) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7960/2015

¶82

Rajendra Kumar Saxena

¶83

Versus

¶84

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. (23) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7961/2015

¶85

Samarjeet Singh

¶86

Versus

¶87

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶88

(24) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7962/2015

¶89

Shri Keral Jan

¶90

Versus

¶91

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr. (25) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.7964/2015

¶92

Mangla Ram Jatav

¶93

Versus

¶94

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

¶95

(26) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9114/2015

¶96

Rajasthan Roadways Seva Nivarat Karamchari Kalyan Samiti

¶97

Versus

¶98

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

¶99

(27) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9194/2015

¶100

Om Prakash Verma

¶101

Versus

¶102

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶103

¶104

(28) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9269/2015

¶105

Shiv Onkar Sharma

¶106

Versus

¶107

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. (29) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10565/2015

¶108

Inder Singh Chauhan Versus RSRTC & Ors. (30) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10817/2015

¶109

Mohd. Anees Khan

¶110

Versus

¶111

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

¶112

(31) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11320/2015

¶113

Mahendra Singh Kachhawa & Anr.

¶114

Versus

¶115

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶116

Narbada Shankar Srimali

¶117

Versus

¶118

The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation &

¶119

Ors.

¶120

Lajja Shankar Shrangi

¶121

Versus

¶122

The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation &

¶123

Ors.

¶124

(34) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.297/2013

¶125

Radhey Shyam Teli

¶126

Versus

¶127

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.

¶128

(35) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12135/2014

¶129

Nav Ratan Mal Sharma & Anr.

¶130

Versus

¶131

The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

¶132

Tejpal Singh Choudhary

¶133

Versus

¶134

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

¶135

¶136

(37) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9148/2015

¶137

Dilip Kumar Jain

¶138

Versus

¶139

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

¶140

(38) S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14006/2015

¶141

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

¶142

Versus

¶143

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.

¶144

Sita Ram Sharma

¶145

Versus

¶146

The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation &

¶147

Ors.

¶148

DATE OF ORDER : 28/09/2015

¶149

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI

¶150

Mr. Sandeep Bhagwati, Mr. Amit Jindal, Mr. Abhi Goyal, Mr.Govind Upadhayay, Mr. Shribhan Gurjar, Mr. Vinodi Lal Mathur, Mr.Sunil Kumar Singodiya, Mr. Iliyas Khan for Mr. Tanveer Ahmed, Mr.Vinod Goyal, Mr. R.B. Sharma, Mr. Kailash Choudhary, Mr.Sandeep Garssa, for petitioners Mr. R.N. Mathur, Sr. Adv. with ] Mr. Vinayak Joshi ] for respondents Mr. Alok Chaturvedi ] ***

¶151

These bunch of writ petitions involve common controversy

¶152

thus have been heard and decided by this judgment.

¶153

The petitiones are those who retired from services of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (in short “the Corporation” ) but have not been extended retiral and other benefits,

¶154

¶155

which include overtime, night allowance, earned leave, etc. It is due to financial crisis in the Corporation. It is stated by the counsel appearing for the Corporation that despite making efforts by the Corporation, they could not get the fund so as to make due payments to the petitioners and others who are entitled for it. The corporation has given cognizance to the problem and in that course, could find out as to how much amount is payable against different source, which include overtime arreas, pay fixation and other related sources. A copy of the letter dated 16^th January, 2015 was also referred to show that efforts have been made by the Corporation even to seek permission to sale a chunk of land to secure amount for its onward payments to the petitioners. In view of above, the Corporation is alive of the situation and their obligation for the payment, but they were unable to pay entire due amount.

¶156

It is true that petitioners are entitled to the due benefit of pension and gratuity apart from all the benefits and for the delayed payment even reasonable interest. The prayer made by the petitioners has not been opposed by the Corporation as such, rather Shri R.N. Mathur, Senior Advocate sought time on the last date to seek instruction and after pursuing the corporation, it is given out that within a period of six months, the due amount would be paid to the petitioners with interest.

¶157

Looking to the facts aforesaid, all these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the Corporation to make payment of due amount to the petitioners within a period of six months from

¶158

¶159

today. It would be along with interest @6% p.a.

¶160

[M.N.BHANDARI], J.

¶161

FRBOHRA Certificate: “All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” FATEH RAJ BOHRA, Sr. P.A.

Radhey Shyam Teli v. R S R T C and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhey Shyam Teli v. R S R T C and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhuwnesh Kumar Meena Vs Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar and Others

Archana Alias Antima Vs Rakesh Kumar Gaur

Hanuman Sahay Jat Vs R S R T C and Ors.

Shri Shish Ram and Anr. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Mumtaz Ahmed Vs Shri Rahul Kumar and Another

Shree Chand Verma Vs Purshottam Agarwal and Others