The High Court at Jaipur disposed of the S.B. Civil Contempt Petition as infructuous because the underlying representation had been decided by a separate order dated 19.12.2014.
The contempt petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
ORDER
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 146/2015 Mumtaz Ahmed vs. Rahul Kumar & Ors. In
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13882/ 2014
Date of order: 28th September, 2015
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
Mr. Vikas Kabra, for the petitioner.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the representation submitted by the petitioner has been decided in pursuance of the order passed by this Court on 19.12.2014, the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
As prayed, the present contempt petition is disposed of as infrcutuous.
[Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia],J.
Mak/-
117
All corrections made in the judgment/order
have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” Anil Makawana P.A.
Mumtaz Ahmed
Rahul Kumar & Ors.
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
