A contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act was disposed of as having become infructuous since the previous order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench Jaipur
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.675 of 2013.
Shree Chand Verma Vs. Shri Purshotam Agarwal & Others
Date of Order ::: 28.09.2015
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
Mr. C.S. Bissa, Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Saurabh Saraswat, Dy. Govt. Counsel for the respondents ***
In the instant contempt petition preferred under
Sections 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, a grievance has been made by the petitioner that the order dated 25.09.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ petition No.2902/2012 has not been complied with.
Mr. C.S. Bissa, the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, has submitted that since the order passed by this Court has been complied with, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be disposed of as such.
On the prayer made by the learned counsel appearing
for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
[Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia] J.
ashok/Certificate - All corrections have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed. Ashok Kumar Songara/Sr.P.A.cum J.W.
Shree Chand Verma
Shri Purshotam Agarwal
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
