Allowed

Dharam Ver Jat v. State Education Departmentors

Rajasthan HC2 Sept 2015CW/12389/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the District Education Officer to accept the petitioner's offline application form for the post of Vidhyalay Sahayak without insisting on a fresh certificate, directing the authority to verify the petitioner's existing experience of 2002-2008 as a Computer Teacher.

What did the court decide?

Directing the District Education Officer to verify the petitioner's experience certificate and counter-sign it, allowing the petitioner to appear in the recruitment.

Dharam Ver Jat Vs State Education Departmentors — Education and Admissions | Rajasthan HC (2015)

¶1

Cw12389/2015

¶2

// 1 //

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶4

ORDER IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12389/2015 With Stay Application No.10848/2015

¶5

Dharm Veer Jat Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

¶6

Date of Order ::: 02.09.2015

¶7

Present Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq

¶8

Shri Ashok Yadav, counsel for petitioner Shri S.K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, with Shri Aniket Vyas, for respondents

¶9

¶10

By the Court :-

¶11

Shri S.K. Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notices on behalf of respondents. Learned counsel for petitioner has supplied him copy of memo of writ petition.

¶12

On the request of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is finally heard.

¶13

Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner has worked as Computer Teacher in Government School, Harsauli, District Alwar, from the year 2002 to 2008 and he has been issued experience certificate in this regard by the Principal, Government School, Harsauli, District Alwar. Grievance of the petitioner is that the District Elementary Education Officer, Alwar, is not issuing him experience certificate on that basis. Hence this writ petition for a direction to the respondents to issue requisite experience certificate to petitioner duly countersigned by concerned District Education Officer for getting bonus marks in the recruitment in question.

¶14

Cw12389/2015

¶15

// 2 //

¶16

Contention of learned counsel for petitioner is that as per condition no.5.2 of the advertisement, the experience of working in a government school is also valid for the purpose of enabling one to apply on the post of Vidhyalay Sahayak.

¶17

Shri S.K. Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General for respondents, has cited Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Vidhyalay Sahayak Subordinate Service Rules, 2015, wherein reference is made to Schedule-I, which requires that minimum one year's experience of working is essential in State Government School/State Recognized/non-Government School/State Government Educational Projects (other than those engaged through placement agency) viz. Lok Jumbish Pariyojana/Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan/District Primary Education Programme/Rajeev Gandhi Pathshala/Shiksha Karmi Board and Madarsa listed under the Madarsa Board.

¶18

Having regard to the facts of the case, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to accept offline application form of the petitioner on hard copy for the post of Vidhyalay Sahayak in pursuance of advertisement issued by respondents. However, the respondent - District Education Officer concerned shall verify the experience certificate of the petitioner of actual working days including the period of summer vacations and, after verification, counter-sign the same or give reasons for not doing so, within two months from the date a copy of this order is produced before him, under intimation to petitioners. The appearance of the petitioners in the said recruitment shall be subject to verification so made by the District Education Officer.

¶19

Cw12389/2015

¶20

// 3 //

¶21

Writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. This also disposes of stay application.

¶22

A copy of this order be provided to Shri S.K. Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General, for onward transmission to authority concerned.

¶23

(Mohammad Rafiq) J.

¶24

//Jaiman//150

¶25

All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.

¶26

Giriraj Prasad Jaiman PS-cum-JW

Dharam Ver Jat v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharam Ver Jat v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Imran Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Vimla and Ors. Vs Swarn Singh and Anr.

Mishri Lal Vs State

Abdul Salam Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Stm Kamar Sultana Vs Dy Director DEPARTMENTandANR

Dinesh Kumar Meena Vs State of Raj and Ors.