recorded by the Tribunal is perverse. He contended that though the Tribunal accepts that the accident had taken place, but has come to the conclusion that deceased Rajaram, who died on 6.11.2002, did not receive grievous injuries, and even on the day of the accident he was dropped at his residence by Swarn Singh, but the learned counsel contends that merely because Swarn Singh dropped Rajaram at his home is no basis to arrive at the conclusion that Rajaram did not die because of the said accident. He further contended that the Post Mortem Report (Ex.7) which is a prime document, clearly states that the injury caused was on account of accident on road, and Rajaram died on account of the injuries suffered. He further contends that the Medical Jurist of the S.M.S. Hospital has given an opinion that the cause of death of Rajaram is “coma due to head injury, and it is sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature”. He further contended that Inquest Report, which is also placed on record, also proves that on account of the said accident the deceased received injuries and thereafter died in the hospital. He further contended that all other evidence lead to an irresistible conclusion that deceased Rajaram got seriously injured and consequently died later. He further contended that the deceased had taken treatment from local doctors and when his condition became serious, he was referred to the S.M.S. Hospital, he was admitted in the hospital and later he died. Learned
