Civil writ petition dismissed in default as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared despite public notice issued in absence of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR
S. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 4933/ 2008
M/s. Advani Hotels & Resorts (India) Ltd. vs. Addl. District Judge (FT) No.3, Jaipur City, Jaipur & Ors.
Date of order:
2nd September, 2014
HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE R. S. CHAUHAN
None pr esent f or t he pet i t i oner .
Despi t e i ssuance of publ i c not i ce by t hi s Cour t i nvi t i ng l i t i gant s t o come and ar gue t hei r case i n absence of t hei r counsel , no one has appear ed on behal f of t he pet i t i oner . Ther ef or e, t he wr i t pet i t i on as wel l as t he st ay appl i cat i on ar e, her eby, di smi ssed i n def aul t .
( R. S. CHAUHAN) , J.
Mak/-
40
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”
Anil Makawana
P.A.
M/s. Advani Hotels & Resorts (India) Ltd.
Addl. District Judge (FT) No.3, Jaipur City, Jaipur
R. S. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
