Single judge order dismissing a civil writ petition and stay application in default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner and counsel despite a public notice by the court.
Writ petition and stay application dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAI PUR BENCH, JAI PUR
S. B. Ci vi l Wr i t Pet i t i on No. 3072/ 2005
Satish Sharma vs. The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Date of order: 2nd September, 2014
HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE R. S. CHAUHAN
None pr esent f or t he pet i t i oner .
Despi t e i ssuance of publ i c not i ce by t hi s Cour t i nvi t i ng l i t i gant s t o come and ar gue t hei r case i n absence of t hei r counsel , nei t her t he pet i t i oner , nor hi s counsel has appear ed bef or e t hi s Cour t . Ther ef or e, t he wr i t pet i t i on as wel l as t he st ay appl i cat i on ar e, her eby, di smi ssed i n def aul t .
( R. S. CHAUHAN) , J.
Mak/-
35
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”
Anil Makawana
P.A.
Satish Sharma
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
R. S. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
