Mange Lal v. State Revenu Departmentors
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition No.17807/12 Date:01/09/2014 HON'BLE…
Petition No.17807/12 Date:01/09/2014 HON'BLE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SB Civil Writ Petition No.17807/12
Date:01/09/2014
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.S. CHAUHAN
None present for the petitioner.
Mr. Hari Ram, Tehsildar, Bharatpur, respondent No.3, present in person.
Despite the issuance of a public notice inviting the litigants to plead their case in the absence of their counsel, as the learned members of the Bar are on strike, no one has appeared before this Court today on behalf of the petitioner.
Therefore, this case is, hereby, dismissed in default. The stay application also stands dismissed.
(R.S. CHAUHAN)J.
GS
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.
Govind Sharma, Sr. PA
Petitioner
Hari Ram
R S Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court