Case dismissed in default as no one appeared due to lawyer's strike after public notice. Stay application also dismissed.
Stay application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8885/2011
1.9.2014
Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S. Chauhan
None present
Despite the issuance of a public notice inviting the litigants to plead their case in the absence of their counsel, as the learned members of the Bar are on strike, no one has appeared before this Court today on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, this case is, hereby, dismissed in default. The
stay application, too, stands dismissed.
(R.S. Chauhan) J. db 69 [All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.] Deepankar Bhattacharya PS
Unknown Petitioner
Unknown Respondent
R.S. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
