A two-judge Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court dismissed a civil writ petition seeking parole for a convict-prisoner with mental ailments, declining to interfere with the District Parole Advisory Committee's decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
O R D E R
D.B. CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.3436/2014
Udai Singh Versus
The State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Date of Order :: 02.07.2014
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ATUL KUMAR JAIN
By post Mr. Shiv Kumar Vyas – Government Advocate
BY THE COURT :
Having considered the facts taken into consideration by the District Parole Advisory Committee while denying regular parole to convict-prisoner Udai Singh in addition to his mental ailment, we are not inclined to grant this petition for writ. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.
[ATUL KUMAR JAIN], J. [GOVIND MATHUR], J.
Pramod
Udai Singh
The State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Govind Mathur
Atul Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
