Mohan v. State of Raj.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court treated the filed writ petition as an application for emergent parole under Rule 10 A, directing the authority to consider it expeditiously by 04.08.2014, and disposed of the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Respondents directed to treat the writ petition as an application for emergent parole and consider it expeditiously by 04.08.2014.
What the court decided
D.B. CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.3419/2014 MOHAN V/S STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
DATE OF ORDER
03.07.2014
HON'BLE MR. GOVIND MATHUR,J HON'BLE MR. ATUL KUMAR JAIN ,J
Mr.K.R.Bhati for the petitioner Mr.Shiv Kumar Vyas, Government Advocate
As per the respondents, the petitioner before approaching this court has not submitted any application to the competent authority to have emergent parole as per Rule 10 A of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 1958.
In view of the facts noticed above, we deem it appropriate to dispose of this petition for writ by directing the respondents to treat the instant petition as an application submitted by the petitioner to the competent authority for grant of emergent parole. The authority competent shall consider the same expeditiously as far as possible on or before 04.08.2014. The petition for writ stands disposed of accordingly.
[ATUL KUMAR JAIN], J. [GOVIND MATHUR], J.
Anil Singh
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition can be treated as an application for emergent parole when no separate application was filed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mohan
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Govind Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/3419/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court