This order dismisses the petitioner's third bail application. The court found the application infructuous, leading to its dismissal without detailed reasoning on the merits of bail.
Application for bail dismissed on grounds of being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR O R D E R
S.B.Criminal Misc.Third Bail Application No.5602/2014 (Keshav Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan)
Date of Order ::: 24.09.2014
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Mr. Rajesh Sharma for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Yadav, PP for the State.
Counsel for the petitioner states that this third application for grant of bail has become infructuous.
Consequently, the third application for grant of bail under Section
439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as having become infructous.
(PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL), J
teekam S.No.41
“All corrections made in the judgment/ order have been incorporated in the judgment/ order being emailed.”
Teekam Khanchandani Private Secretary
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Keshav Meena
State of Rajasthan
PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
