Disposed

Kailash Chand Meena Anr. v. State Education Departmentors

Rajasthan HC6 Mar 2013CW/3368/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order disposed of the writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to make a representation. The respondents were directed to consider the petitioner's case based on the cited judgment, subject to availability of posts and pending appeal outcomes.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to make a representation; respondents directed to consider same within one month subject to merit and pending appeal.

Kailash Chand Meena Anr. Vs State Education… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3368/2013

¶3

Kailash Chand Meena & Anr.

¶4

Versus

¶5

State of Rajasthan & Ors.

¶6

DATE OF ORDER : 06/03/2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI

¶7

Mr. Kailash Chand Meena, Petitioner No.1 present in person

¶8

¶9

Learned counsel submits that issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma & Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. ( SBCWP No.3414/2009 & 3 other connected petitions ). The aforesaid decision was given after hearing both the parties, thus petitioner/s may be given liberty to make a representation to respondents to consider his/their case in the light of the judgment aforesaid.

¶10

In view of the prayer made, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. If any representation is made, respondents are directed to look into the same and if case of petitioner/s is covered by the judgment in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma (supra), his/their case may also be considered in the light of the directions given in the judgment aforesaid subject to other eligibility and the merit. It may be in his/their category. Consideration aforesaid may be made within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order and representation.

¶11

The consideration would, however, be made to the extent of posts advertised and the order passed in this case would remain subject to final outcome of the appeal as it is recently informed that an appeal has been preferred in the case supra, thus petitioner/s has/have agreed to abide the final outcome of the appeal. Accordingly, if judgment in the case supra is reversed, then this order would be rendered ineffective.

¶12

[M.N.BHANDARI], J.

¶13

FRBOHRA/3368CWP2013.doc

¶14

Certificate:

¶15

“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.” FATEH RAJ BOHRA, P.A.

Kailash Chand Meena Anr. v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kailash Chand Meena Anr. v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramnarayan Meena Vs State Fores Departmentors

Municipal Council Sikar and Ors. Vs Rawat Singh and Anr.

Municipal Council Sikar and Ors. Vs Mehmood Khan and Anr.

Mahesh Singh Vs State and Ors.

Kanhaiya Lal Dhaker and Ors. Vs State Education Departmentors

Dinesh Kumar Vs State Education Departmentors