The single bench disposed of the writ petition upholding the High Court's prior judgment and directed respondents to consider the petitioner's representation.
Liberty granted to make representation; respondents directed to consider and decide; benefits to be extended if covered, otherwise speaking order to be conveyed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
ORDER
SB Civil Writ Petition No.3399/2013
Ramnarayan Meena versus State of Rajasthan & ors 5.3.2013
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MN BHANDARI
Mr NK Tiwawri – for petitioner(s) BY THE COURT:
It is stated that the issue involved in this writ petition is covered by the judgment of this court in the case of “Dev Krishna Daroga & ors versus State of Rajasthan & ors”, SB Civil Writ Petition No. 3620/2008, decided on 6.2.2012 at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. Petitioner(s) wants to make a representation to the respondents in the light of the said judgment.
In view of aforesaid, writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. In case of representation, respondents are directed to consider and decide the same. If it is covered by the judgment cited above, then to extend the benefits to the petitioners (s). In case it is not covered, petitioner(s) may be conveyed the same by a speaking order.
(MN BHANDARI), J.
bnsharma
All corrections made in the judgment/ order have been incorporated in the judgment/ order being emailed.
(BN Sharma)
PS-cum-JW
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dev Krishna Daroga & ors versus State of Rajasthan & orsReferred¶8
Dev Krishna Daroga & ors versus State of Rajasthan & ors, SB Civil Writ Petition No. 3620/2008
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramnarayan Meena
State of Rajasthan
MN BHANDARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
