Disposed

Kanhaiya Lal Dhaker and Ors. v. State Education Departmentors

Rajasthan HC7 Mar 2013CW/3667/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to the respondents regarding consideration of their case in light of a connected judgment, subject to the final outcome of a pending appeal.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioners to make a representation to respondents for consideration of their case in light of the connected judgment within one month, subject to eligibility and pending appeal.

Kanhaiya Lal Dhaker and Ors. Vs State… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3667/2013

¶3

Kanhaiya Lal Dhaker & Ors.

¶4

Versus

¶5

State of Rajasthan & Anr.

¶6

DATE OF ORDER : 07/03/2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI

¶7

Mr. Pulkit Jain, Petitioner No.2, present in person

¶8

¶9

Learned counsel submits that issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma & Ors. Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. ( SBCWP No.3414/2009 & 3 other connected petitions ). The aforesaid decision was given after hearing both the parties, thus petitioner/s may be given liberty to make a representation to respondents to consider his/their case in the light of the judgment aforesaid.

¶10

In view of the prayer made, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. If any representation is made, respondents are directed to look into the same and if case of petitioner/s is covered by the judgment in the case of Naresh Kumar Sharma (supra), his/their case may also be considered in the light of the directions given in the judgment aforesaid subject to other eligibility and the merit. It may be in his/their category. Consideration aforesaid may be made within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order and representation.

¶11

The consideration would, however, be made to the extent of posts advertised and the order passed in this case would remain subject to final outcome of the appeal as it is recently informed that an appeal has been preferred in the case supra, thus petitioner/s has/have agreed to abide the final outcome of the appeal. Accordingly, if judgment in the case supra is reversed, then this order would be rendered ineffective.

¶12

[M.N.BHANDARI], J.

¶13

FRBOHRA/3667CWP2013.doc

¶14

Certificate:

¶15

“All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.”

¶16

FATEH RAJ BOHRA, P.A.

Kanhaiya Lal Dhaker and Ors. v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Lal Dhaker and Ors. v. State Education Departmentors

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Singh Vs State and Ors.

Kailash Chand Meena Anr. Vs State Education Departmentors

Ramnarayan Meena Vs State Fores Departmentors

Dinesh Kumar Vs State Education Departmentors

Rajesh Kumar Vs State Education Dep and Anr.

Pulkit Jain and Ors. Vs State Education Departmentors