aforesaid e n tries leave little room for doubt that the said land is reserved fo r common vi l lage purposes and vests in the G ram Panchayat. As regards th e remaining a rea measuring 4 kanals compri s ed in Khasra No.49, the same i s recorded as ‘Chahi’ in the Jamabandi for t h e year 2013-14. The said entr y denotes cul t ivable agricultural land and not built-up abadi. There is nothin g on record t o indicate existence of any cons t ruction over the said portion. I n these circu m stances, the petitioner's relianc e upon the plea of ‘abadi deh’ i s of no assist a nce. Even in his written statem e nt, it is not his stand that he ha s any residen t ial house in that khasra numb e r or led any evidence regardin g existence o f any permanent structure. Thi s Court in Dalwinder Singh v. Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala Cantt. and others, CWP No11799 of 2026, decided on 03.07.2026 , while considering the scope o f Section 2( g )(4a) of the Act, observed tha t after incorporation of the sai d provision, u se of vacant land situated in a b adi deh or gorah deh become s immateriali f not owned by any person, and such land would fall within th e definition of Shamlat Deh . The said view w as rendered following the la w laid down b y the Division Bench in Gram Panchayat Village Bir Kalwa v. Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala, 2015 (1) RCR (Civil) 505. 19. Thus, the principal submissi o ns advanced on behalf of th e petitioner, n amely, the plea of long poss e ssion prior to 26.01.1950, th e challenge t o the demarcation proceeding s , the pendency of proceeding s under Secti o n 13-A of the Act and the co n tention regarding the nature o f the dispute d land, have all been duly consi d ered by the revenue courts an d have been c oncurrently found against the petitioner. This Court finds n o
