Petitioner sought quashing of an order rejecting his claim for coverage under the General Provident Fund/Old Pension Scheme. The petition was called thrice with no appearance for the petitioner and was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-20107-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2026
Jagroop Singh
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & others …Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present: - None for the petitioner.
Mr. N.P.S.Hira, DAG, Punjab.
NAMIT KUMAR, J . (Oral)
07.07.2026 (NAMIT KUMAR) Vimal JUDGE
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Whether reportable | Yes/No |
VIMAL KUMAR 2026.07.08 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jagroop Singh
State of Punjab
Namit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
