Vijay Laxmi v. Yogesh Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****…
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
110+258 CM-8921-C-2024 in/and RSA-4922-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision.:12.09.2024
Vijay Laxmi
Appellant
Vs.
Yogesh Kumar Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: Mr. Tarun Yadav, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for the respondent. ****
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
CM-8921-C-2024:
This is an applica�on under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC moved by the appellant so as to allow this appeal in view of the affidavit (Annexure A-1) and compromise (Annexure A-2) arrived at between the par�es.
Learned counsel for the respondent has no objec�on.
In view of the admi0ed posi�on that ma0er has since been
compromised in terms of affidavit of the respondent (Annexure A-1), the applica�on is allowed.
Main case (O&M).:
The present appeal i.e. RSA-4922-2016 is hereby disposed of in
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.09.12 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CM-8921-C-2024 in/and RSA-4922-2016 (O&M) -2-
terms of compromise dated 12.07.2024 (Annexure A-2) which shall form part
and parcel of this order.
Pending applica�on(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE September 12, 2024 Nee�ka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2024.09.12 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijay Laxmi
Yogesh Kumar
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court