Husband sought a direction to the trial Court at Jagraon to decide his wife's matrimonial petition (HMA No.62 of 2022) within a stipulated period. The Court held that fixing a specific timeframe would put undue pressure on the trial court given unknown pendency, and instead directed expeditious disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-5244-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 11, 2024
Rajinder Singh Boparai …Pe33oner Versus
Sukhwinder Kaur …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr. N.S. Dadwal, Advocate for the pe��oner.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
By way of this pe��on filed under Ar�cle 227 of the Cons�tu�on of India, pe��oner prays to issue direc�on to the trial Court, Jagraon to decide the pe��on bearing HMA No.62 of 2022, �tled as “Sukhwinder Kaur v. Rajinder Singh Boparai”, within some s�pulated period.
Disposed of accordingly.
| September 11, 2024 | (DEEPAK GUPTA) |
|---|---|
| sarita |
JUDGE |
| Whether reasoned/speaking: | Yes/No |
| Whether reportable: | Yes/No |
Sarita Rani 2024.09.11 06:17 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction can be issued to the Family Court, Jagraon to decide HMA No.62 of 2022 within a stipulated time frame.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajinder Singh Boparai
Sukhwinder Kaur
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
