Appellant failed to appear despite last opportunity being granted. Court dismissed the appeal in default for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA-151-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 09, 2024
Dharambir
… Appellant
Versus
Krishan Lal and another
…Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - None.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
There is no representa�on on behalf of the appellant, despite
pass over.
On the last date of hearing, while adjourning the ma!er for today, it was made clear that it shall be the last opportunity. S�ll, there is no representa�on on behalf of the appellant. It appears that appellant is no longer interested in pursuing this appeal.
Dismissed in default for want of prosecu�on.
September 09, 2024 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2024.09.09 03:58 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
Dharambir
Krishan Lal
another
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
