Second appeal against an order of the First Appellate Court. The trial court had since decided the matter and a further appeal was filed, rendering this appeal infructuous; disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SAO-23-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: September 06, 2024
Ujjagar Singh … Appellant
Versus
Raj Singh and others …Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Sunil Agnihotri, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Satbir Rathore, Advocate for respondent No.1
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Power of a!orney has been filed on behalf of contes$ng respondent No.1.
September 06, 2024 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2024.09.07 02:58 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
Ujjagar Singh
Raj Singh
Deepak Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
