Coram Supreme Court set aside an order dismissing a civil suit under Order 9 Rule 5 CPC for lack of service, directing the trial court to provide plaintiffs an opportunity to serve defendants.
Impugned order dated 15.05.2023 set aside; plaintiffs directed to serve defendants No.9 and 10 in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.117
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
********
CR No.5143 of 2024 Date of Decision:06.09.2024 Mehar Singh and others .....Pe..oners Vs. Manshi and others .....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate and Mr. Vrishank Suri, Advocate for the pe��oners.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (Oral)
Pe��oners are plain�ffs before the trial Court in Civil Suit No.CS-380-2022 �tled “Mehar Singh and others Vs. Manshi and others” . They are aggrieved by the impugned order dated 15.05.2023 (Annexure P.3) whereby the suit qua defendants No.9 and 10 has been dismissed under Order 9 Rule 5 CPC.
Disposed of.
September 06, 2024 ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
VIVEK PAHWA 2024.09.06 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dismissing the suit under Order 9 Rule 5 CPC was passed without providing opportunity to serve defendants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MEHAR SINGH AND OTHERS
MANSHI AND OTHERS
DEEPAK GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
