Second regular appeal dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel twice reported having no instructions and appellants could not be traced, with liberty to revive if anything survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
204
RSA-1427-1996 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.11.2024
DALJIT SINGH AND ORS ... APPELLANT(s) VERSUS GURBACHAN SINGH AND ANR ...RESPONDENT(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Ashok Gupta, Advocate for the appellants.
Service of respondent No.2 dispensed with vide order dated 01.07.1996.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
07.11.2024 Ankur
(ALKA SARIN) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Ankur Goyal 2024.11.08 08:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Daljit Singh and others
Gurbachan Singh
Respondent No.2
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
