Revision petition regarding additional evidence in rebuttal of a counter-claim was not pressed. Counsel sought permission to withdraw with liberty to apply before the Trial Court for leading rebuttal evidence. Petition dismissed as withdrawn with that liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
323
CR-486-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.11.2024
Darbara Singh ....Petitioner
VERSUS
Harkamal Singh alias Harkanwal Singh and Another ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Munish Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kamaljeet Singh Mamrat, Advocate for respondent No.2.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
( ALKA SARIN )
07.11.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.08 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner could lead rebuttal evidence qua the respondent's counter-claim by way of additional evidence in revision.
Darbara Singh
Harkamal Singh alias Harkanwal Singh
Respondent No.2
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
