Suit near conclusion before trial court; both parties agreed status quo on possession be maintained till decision. Revision petition disposed with directions to maintain status quo per earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
278
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR-2902-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.11.2024
Raj Pal ... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Bode & Ors ... Respondent(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Shruti Mandhotra, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Dawar, Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
07.11.2024 ( ALKA SARIN ) Yogesh Sharma JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
Yogesh Sharma 2024.11.08 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. High Court Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether status quo regarding possession of the suit property should continue until the suit is decided.
Raj Pal
Bode
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
