Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared and the notice issued to the petitioner returned unserved due to an incorrect address. Liberty granted to revive the petition if anything survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN JAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
303
CR-4292-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision : 06.11.2024
Surender Singh
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Balwinder Bajwa @ Balwinder Singh Bajwa and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : None for the petitioner.
Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for respondent No.1.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
“ Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner has informed that arguing counsel has gone abroad and she seeks time to file Vakalatnama on behalf of petitioner.
Adjourned to 26.04.2024.
In the meantime, notice be also given to the petitioner for the date fixed.”
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.07 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
CR-4292-2017
-2-
( ALKA SARIN ) 06.11.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.07 10:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Surender Singh
Balwinder Bajwa @ Balwinder Singh Bajwa
Respondents No.2 and Others
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
