Petitioners stated the writ petition had become infructuous; the court ordered its disposal as such.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
233
CWP-9483-2021
Date of decision: 10.12.2024
Seema and another
...Petitioner
Versus
National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Sandeep Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. A.S. Virk, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for respondent No.2.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present
petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
10.12.2024 Hemant
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.12.10 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Seema and another
National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra and another
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
