Petitioners sought benefit of adhoc service for grant of Higher Standard Grade, relying on a related petition dismissed earlier. With no representation on their behalf, the High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and disposed of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
467
CWP-14817-2003 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.09.2024
Mehar Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: None for the petitioners.
Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
adhoc service to the petitioners for grant of Higher Standard Grade and reliance was placed on pendency of CWP-15776-2001, which vide order dated 15.12.2022 had been dismissed due to sheer effluxion of time.
well the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 05.09.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.09.07 13:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners are entitled to benefit of adhoc service for Higher Standard Grade.
Mehar Singh and others
State of Haryana and others
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
