Petitioner granted part of retirement benefits sought a direction that any remaining benefits be decided on representation. Respondents agreed; court disposed of petition directing time-bound decision of the representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
241
CWP-11427-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.12.2024
Dhoom Singh ....Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Rajiv Anand, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate for the respondents-UOI.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
| 10.12.2024 Hemant |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking/reasoned | : Yes | / No | |
| Whether reportable | : Yes | / No |
HAMANT 2024.12.10 19:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Dhoom Singh
Union of India
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
