Petition concerning the Agnipath scheme was disposed of as infructuous after counsel for Union of India noted the scheme had been upheld by the Supreme Court, which petitioner's counsel could not refute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
250
CWP-9347-2021 Date of decision: 09.12.2024
Bhupinder Jangu
...Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
Present : Mr. Ajay Vijarania, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Anita Balyan, Advocate for the respondents-UOI.
AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral)
1. Learned counsel for the respondents-UOI submits that the
present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of in wake of the Agnipath scheme, which was upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court, a fact which learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to refute.
2. Ordered accordingly.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
09.12.2024 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No
HAMANT 2024.12.10 14:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition survives after the Agnipath scheme was upheld by the Supreme Court.
Bhupinder Jangu
Union of India
Aman Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
