Writ petition concerning an admission fee deposit was withdrawn after the petitioner informed that the fee had been accepted by the respondent-college, rendering the cause no longer surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIG A RH
Civil Writ Peti t ion No. 23546 of 2024 (O&M) Date of D ecision: 03.10.2024
Aadit Ku m ar (minor) through his father A shwani Kumar
…..Petitioner
versus
Union Te r ritory of Chandigarh and other s
…..Respondents
������ ��������������������������������������������� ��������������������������������������������
Present:Mr. Anil Mehta, Advocate w ith Ms. Sukriti Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sumeet Jain, Addl. Stan d ing Counsel with Mr. Himanshu Arora, panel C ounsel for respondentsUnion Territory, Chandigar h . ****
��������������������������������
Learned counsel for the pe t itioner informs that admissio n fee amo u nting to Rs. 1,10,000/- US$ has been deposited by th e petitione r through Bank Draft from N RE account which has bee n accepted by the respondent-college on 25.09.2024 and therefore, it i s contende d that the cause raised in this p e tition does not survive and th e petitione r wishes to withdraw this petitio n .
In view of the prayer ma d e, the petition is dismissed a s
withdraw n
(SHEEL NAGU)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE
03.10.20 2 4
ravinder Whether speaking/reasoned √Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No√
RAVINDER KUMAR 2024.10.03 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Aadit Kumar (minor) through his father Ashwani Kumar
Union Territory of Chandigarh and others
Sheel Nagu
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
