Petition sought quashing of orders passed by the SDJM, Sunam and the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur. At the outset counsel for the petitioner prayed to withdraw the petition; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
219
Criminal Misc. No. M-6558 of 2019 Date of decision :-04.10.2024
Balwinder Singh
…..Petitioner
Versus
Seeta
…..Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:Mr. Mikhail Kad, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for quashing of impugned order dated 09 . 5.2018 (Annexure P-3) passe d by learned Sub Divisional Judicial M agistrate, Sunam and the imp u gned order dated 16.11.2018 (Annexu r e P-5) passed by learned A dditional Sessions Judge, Sangrur.
At the very outset, learne d counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petiti o n.
Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if an y , shall stands disposed of.
October 0 4, 2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Vijay Asija JUDGE
Whether sp e aking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Re p ortable Yes / No
VIJAY ASIJA 2024.10.04 17.28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Balwinder Singh
Seeta
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
