matter as, in actual fact the petitioner and the complainant/respondent No.2 herein, were in a consensual relationship. Although, this fact has been admitted by the complainant in the FIR, however, she has contradictorily alleged that the petitioner had made her objectionable videos, and on the threat of making viral the said objectionable videos, he had continued physical relations with her. It has further been stated in the FIR that thereafter, the petitioner had also promised to marry the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said statements are, on the face of it, falsified, as the petitioner himself is already married and so is the complainant. In this regard, learned counsel refers to the Marriage Certificate of the complainant at Annexure P-4; as also the complaint filed by present husband of the complainant against the complainant under Sections 323, 191, 192, 193, 417 and 506 IPC, Police Station City (Annexure P- 3). It is further informed that the complainant has already been married twice before and has a child from her previous marriage. She has admitted in the FIR that the petitioner has been paying the school fees of her son, which transactions have been made online. She has also admitted that the petitioner is "real good man and was helping me in my troubled times". It is accordingly contended that the allegations contained in the FIR are false and fabricated.
