Petitioner sought withdrawal of petition with liberty to file afresh. Court permitted withdrawal with said liberty. Petition dismissed as withdrawn following the amendment of FIR.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
129
CRM-M-42969-2024
Date of Decision: 02.09.2024
Bhupinder Singh @ Bhinda
.… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Mr. Chanakya Batta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kunwarbir Singh, A.A.G., Punjab.
Mr. Prince Saini, Advocate for respondent No.2. ****
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Power of attorney filed on behalf of respondent No. 2 in Court today is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, informs that offence under Section 376 IPC has been added to the present FIR vide rapat No. 28 dated 29.08.2024.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
Permitted to do so with liberty aforesaid.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
02.09.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Divyanshi JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
DIVYANSHI 2024.09.04 11:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhupinder Singh @ Bhinda
State of Punjab
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
