Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars. Vakalatnama of respondent No.2 taken on record. Petition dismissed as withdrawn and pending applications disposed of.
Liberty to withdraw and file afresh with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
126-2
CRM-M-41572-2024 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 02.09.2024
Santro Devi
.… Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: - Ms. Parul Panchal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate for respondent No.2.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No.2 in Court
today is taken on record.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw present petition with liberty to file afresh with better particulars.
Permitted to do so with liberty aforesaid.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
02.09.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) Divyanshi JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
DIVYANSHI 2024.09.04 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Santro Devi
State of Haryana
Respondent No.2
Nidhi Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
