Regular bail sought under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC. The court noted the petitioner had been detained about six months with only one of fifteen prosecution witnesses examined, held further detention would serve no purpose without commenting on merits, and granted bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRM-M-38313-2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-38313-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.12.2024
Rohit ...Petitioner
Versus
State of P unjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present: Mr. Gulzar Mohammad, Ad v ocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Prabhdeep Singh Dhali w al, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Anurag Arora, Advocat e , for the complainant.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Section/s |
|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | 11.05.2024 | Sadar, Jalandh ar |
406, 420, 465, 468, 471**,** |
| Commissionerat e |
120-B IPC |
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)
VIMAL KUMAR 2024.12.10 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2
CRM-M-38313-2024 (O&M)
09.12.2024 (GURVINDER SINGH GILL) Vimal JUDGE
Whether speaking/reason e d: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
VIMAL KUMAR 2024.12.10 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on regular bail in a cheating/forgery FIR given over six months' custody and slow trial progress?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rohit
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
