Petitioners sought quashing of FIR under Sections 420 and 506 IPC on the basis of a compromise with the complainant. Following the Full Bench ruling in Kulwinder Singh, the Court quashed the FIR and subsequent proceedings qua petitioners.
FIR No.7 dated 13.1.2022 and subsequent proceedings quashed qua petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-36293-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-9.12.2024
Dharam Singh and another … Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present: Ms. Komal Preet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Japjot Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. G.S. Rawat, Advocate for respondent No.2.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.12.10 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CRM-M-36293-2024 (O&M)
( 2 )
No.2/complainant – Manjit Kaur have been recorded to the effect that they have compromised the matter amongst themselves.
| 9.12.2024 | ( Gu | rvinder Singh Gill ) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pankaj | Judge | ||
| Whether reasoned/speaking | Yes / No | ||
| Whether reportable | Yes / No |
Pankaj Kakkar 2024.12.10 14:51 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR under Sections 420 and 506 IPC should be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of PunjabRelied on¶6
2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharam Singh
Bhupinder Singh
State of Punjab
Manjit Kaur
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
