Allowed

Didar Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC5 Sept 2024CRM-M/14842/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petition to quash FIR No. 33 registered in Punjab under Sections 384 and 34 IPC. Based on a judicial order confirming a voluntary compromise among the parties, the Court relied on precedent to dismiss criminal proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 33 dated 7.5.2023 registered at Police Station Singh Bhagwantpur, Rupnagar is quashed.

Didar Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Others — Quashing and FIR | Punjab & Haryana HC (2024)

¶1

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

¶2

CRM-M-14842-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:-5.9.2024

¶3

Didar Singh and others … Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ... Respondents

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶5

Present:Ms. Dilmrig Nayani, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Japjot Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Harshit Joon, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4.

¶6

¶7

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)

¶8

The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.33, dated 7.5.2023 registered at Police Station Singh Bhagwantpur, Rupnagar, under Sections 384, 34 of Indian Penal Code, wherein offences under Sections 419 and 170 IPC were added later on, and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of a compromise stated to have been effected between the parties.

¶9

Vide order dated 21.3.2024, the parties had been directed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate so as to get their statements recorded qua the factum of compromise.

¶10

Report of learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Rupnagar has been received, wherein it has been reported that joint statements of petitioners/accused

¶11

Pankaj Kakkar 2024.09.06 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶12

CRM-M-14842-2024 (O&M) ( 2 )

¶13

Didar Singh, Randhir Singh, Avtar Singh and also of respondents No.2 to 4 namely Kulwinder Singh, Harjit Singh and Parmjit Singh have been recorded to the effect that they have compromised the matter amongst themselves.

¶14

Respondents No.2 to 4 namely Kulwinder Singh, Harjit Singh and Parmjit Singh in their joint statement have stated that they have no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

¶15

Learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Rupnagar has specifically opined that the parties have entered into compromise voluntarily and without any undue influence.

¶16

In view of the aforesaid compromise and bearing in mind the law laid down by Full Bench of this Court in 2007(3) RCR (Crl.) 1052 Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab , the present petition is allowed and FIR No.33, dated 7.5.2023 registered at Police Station Singh Bhagwantpur, Rupnagar, under Sections 384, 34 of Indian Penal Code, wherein offences under Sections 419 and 170 IPC were added later on, and all subsequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed qua petitioners.

¶17

5.9.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) Pankaj Judge Whether reasoned/speaking Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No

¶18

Pankaj Kakkar 2024.09.06 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Didar Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Didar Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Suman Lakhani Vs United Bank of India

Suman Lakhani Vs United Bank of India

Muskan and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar @ Dara Singh Vs State of Haryana

Deepak Yadav Vs State of Punjab and Another