Appeal against conviction; appellant expired during pendency, so the appeal was disposed of as abated and surety discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
201
CRA-S-1663-SB-2011 Date of Decision: 25.09.2024
Anoop Singh @ Noopa
....Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab ....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate
for the appellant.
Ms. Swati Batra, DAG, Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Aggrieved by the judgment of conviction vide order dated 03.06.2011 passed by the Judge, Special Court, Patiala, appellant has come up before this Court.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
25.09.2024
anju rani
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable? No
ANJU RANI 2024.09.26 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Anoop Singh @ Noopa
State of Punjab
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
