Revision petition under Section 401 Cr.P.C. challenging appellate upholding of acquittal was withdrawn by the petitioner on instructions and disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
241 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRR No.1598 of 2019(O&M) Date of Decision: 24.09.2024
Balbir Chand
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Another … Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sukhdev Singh, A.A.G., Punjab.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J .
Aggrieved by dismissal of appeal whereby the judgment dated 28.02.2017 passed by the trial Court acquitting the respondent-accused was upheld by the First Appellate Court, the petitioner had come up before this Court by way of filing the present revision petition under Section 401 Cr.P.C..
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE 24.09.2024 Sonia Puri Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No.
Sonia Puri 2024.09.25 15:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Balbir Chand
State of Punjab
Another
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
