Applicant unrepresented on multiple dates in application for condonation of delay and leave to appeal; court dismissed both for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
238 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-28205-2023 CRM-28208-2023 in/and CRM-A-934-2023 Date of Decision: 25.09.2024
Tulsa Devi
...Applicant
Versus
Anuradha Verma …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA
Present: None for the applicant.
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
On the last date of hearing, following order was passed:-
“Called again.
On the last two dates of hearing, no one is appearing on behalf of the applicant and today also, the applicant is unrepresented.
In the interest of jus�ce, list on 25.09.2024.
It is clarified that if the applicant remains absent on the next date also, this Court shall dismiss the applica�on for condona�on of delay as well as leave to appeal, for nonprosecu�on.”
Today also, there is no representa�on on behalf of the applicant.
Given above, the applica�on for condona�on of delay as well as the leave
to appeal is dismissed for non-prosecu�on. All pending applica�ons, if any also stands disposed.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE
25.09.2024 Jyo� Sharma
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No .
Jyoti Sharma 2024.09.27 10:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh
1
Tulsa Devi
Anuradha Verma
Anoop Chitkara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
