Petitioner sought Article 227 direction to the Gurdaspur Executing Court for time-bound disposal of her pending execution application. Court held no such direction could be given since warrant of attachment was already effected, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.140
CR-4472-2024 Date of Decision: 08.08.2024
RAVINDER KAUR
....Petitioner
Versus
AMARJIT RAM AND OTHERS
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
The petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of direction to the Executing Court, Gurdaspur, to decide the application i.e. EXE-105-2023 titled “Ravinder Kaur and another v/s Amarjit Ram and others”, in a time bound manner.
On inquiry by the court, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the said execution application was instituted on 30.11.2023 and warrant of attachment has since been duly effected.
In the given circumstances, no such time bound direction can be given to the Executing Court. Hence, the instant revision petition is hereby dismissed.
However, if the petitioner has any grievance, he can always make a submission before the Executing Court.
(ARCHANA PURI) 08.08.2024 JUDGE
����
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : Yes/No
Sonu 2024.08.08 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Executing Court to decide the execution application in a time-bound manner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravinder Kaur
Amarjit Ram
Archana Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
