Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to comply with prior court orders and deposit costs despite repeated opportunities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
278
CR-500-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision : 08.11.2024
Karnail Singh
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Gurmeet Kaur and Others ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Aayush Bansal, Advocate for Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. ,
Mr. R.S. Budhwar, Advocate for respondent No.1.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
“ On 28.03.2023 last opportunity was granted to
the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the order dated 29.04.2022 subject to payment of Rs.5,000/as costs. Neither the order dated 29.04.2022 has been complied with nor the costs have been deposited. Even today a request for an adjournment has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that he does not have instructions.
In view thereof, interim order dated 04.03.2021 stands vacated. Copy of the order be communicated to the concerned Court.
List on 08.11.2024.”
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.11 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
-2-
CR-500-2021
( ALKA SARIN ) 08.11.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.11 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Karnail Singh
Gurmeet Kaur
Others
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
