Revision petition withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file afresh with better particulars; withdrawal application allowed and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH C OURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
117 CM-20163-CII-2024 in/and CR-4538-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 14.11.2024
Palwinder Kaur
....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Punjab and Another ....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Kumar, DAG, Punjab for the respondents.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
CM-20163-CII-2024
petition.
CR-4538-2024 (O&M)
( ALKA SARIN ) 14.11.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.16 08:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. High Court, Chandigarh
Palwinder Kaur
State of Punjab
Another
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
