Petitioner sought revision to modify interim maintenance. Court noted the impugned order was amendable only by appeal per a recent Division Bench judgment. Petitioner withdrew revision with liberty to appeal.
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA B AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
124
CR-6646-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision : 14.11.2024
Rinku Kharb
....Petitioner
VERSUS
Ravinder Singh
....Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Paras Choudhary, Advocate for Mr. M.S. Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
( ALKA SARIN ) 14.11.2024 JUDGE jk
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
JITENDER KUMAR 2024.11.16 08:25 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. High Court, Chandigarh
Rinku Kharb
Ravinder Singh
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
